Comparative Evaluation of Machine Learning Algorithms for Spectrophotometric Dental Shade Classification

Main Article Content

Pei-ting Chung

Abstract

Accurate dental shade matching is critical for achieving optimal esthetic outcomes in restorative dentistry. This study presents a comparative evaluation of machine learning algorithms for spectrophotometric dental shade classification, focusing on Support Vector Machine, Random Forest, and Extreme Learning Machine approaches. Spectral reflectance data from 1,280 standardized dental composite specimens (as controlled surrogates for shade-guide categories) across 16 VITA Classical shades were collected using a calibrated spectrophotometer. Feature extraction methods, including CIELAB coordinates, spectral coefficients, and principal component analysis, were systematically compared. Experimental results demonstrate that the Extreme Learning Machine achieved the highest classification accuracy of 97.8%; its mean ΔE00 was 1.42, and 89.3% of predictions fell below the clinical acceptability threshold of ΔE00 = 1.8, with a b coordinate RMSE of 2.14. Random Forest demonstrated superior robustness in edge-shade classification, achieving 94.2% accuracy. The findings provide practical guidance for selecting algorithms in industrial dental shade-matching applications.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Comparative Evaluation of Machine Learning Algorithms for Spectrophotometric Dental Shade Classification. (2026). Journal of Sustainability, Policy, and Practice, 2(1), 204-214. http://schoalrx.com/index.php/jspp/article/view/94

References

1. Q. Li, D. Chen, H. Wang, and J. Shen, "A machine learning based approach to standardizing tooth color and shade recommendations," The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, Advance online publication, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.09.010

2. M. Tejada-Casado, R. Ghinea, M. Á. Martínez-Domingo, M. M. Pérez, J. C. Cardona, J. Ruiz-López, and L. J. Herrera, "Validation of a hyperspectral imaging system for color measurement of in-vivo dental structures," Micromachines, vol. 13, no. 11, Article 1929, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13111929

3. A. A. Karcioglu, E. Efitli, E. Simsek, A. Ozdogan, F. Karatas, and T. Senocak, "ML-based tooth shade assessment to prevent metamerism in different clinic lights," Lasers in Medical Science, vol. 40, no. 1, Article 39, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-025-04297-y

4. F. Rashid, T. H. Farook, and J. Dudley, "Digital shade matching in dentistry: A systematic review," Dentistry Journal, vol. 11, no. 11, Article 250, 2023.

5. S.-L. Chen, H.-S. Zhou, T.-Y. Chen, T.-H. Lee, C.-A. Chen, T.-L. Lin, N.-H. Lin, L.-H. Wang, S.-Y. Lin, W.-Y. Chiang, P. A. R. Abu, and M.-Y. Lin, "Dental shade matching method based on hue, saturation, value color model with machine learning and fuzzy decision," Sensors and Materials, vol. 32, no. 10, pp. 3185-3207, 2020.

6. S. Shetty, S. Gali, D. Augustine, and S. V. Sowmya, "Artificial intelligence systems in dental shade-matching: A systematic review," Journal of Prosthodontics, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 519-532, 2024.

7. M. Tejada-Casado, V. Duveiller, R. Ghinea, A. Gautheron, R. Clerc, J. P. Salomon, M. M. Pérez, M. Hébert, and L. J. Herrera, "Performance of two-flux and four-flux models for predicting the spectral reflectance and transmittance factors of flowable dental resin composites," Dental Materials, vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 797-806, 2023.

8. L. J. Herrera, R. Ghinea, R. D. Paravina, A. Della Bona, C. Igiel, M. Linninger, G. Özbay, and M. Amar, "Machine-learning-based spectral modeling: A biomimetic guide for enhancing esthetics," Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, vol. 36, no. 9, pp. 1265-1274, 2024.

9. IEEE ITC-CSCC, "DentShadeAI: A framework for automatic dental shade matching through mobile phone camera," 37th International Technical Conference on Circuits/Systems, Computers and Communications, pp. 1-4, 2022.

10. E. Mahn, S. C. Tortora, B. Olate, F. Cacciuttolo, J. Kernitsky, and G. Jorquera, "Comparison of visual analog shade matching, a digital visual method with a cross-polarized light filter, and a spectrophotometer for dental color matching," Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, vol. 125, no. 3, pp. 511-516, 2021.

11. M. Tejada-Casado, R. Ghinea, M. M. Pérez, H. Lübbe, I. S. Pop-Ciutrila, J. Ruiz-López, and L. J. Herrera, "Reflectance and color prediction of dental material monolithic samples with varying thickness," Dental Materials, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 622-631, 2022.

12. S. Hein, J. Nold, M. Masannek, S. Westland, B. C. Spies, and K. T. Wrbas, "Comparative evaluation of intraoral scanners and a spectrophotometer for percent correct shade identification in clinical dentistry," Clinical Oral Investigations, vol. 29, no. 1, Article 39, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-024-06124-0

13. S. Kang, B. Shon, E. Y. Park, S. Jeong, and E.-K. Kim, "Diagnostic accuracy of dental caries detection using ensemble techniques in deep learning with intraoral camera images," PLOS ONE, vol. 19, no. 9, Article e0310004, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0310004

14. M. Tejada-Casado, V. Duveiller, R. Ghinea, A. Gautheron, R. Clerc, J. P. Salomon, M. M. Pérez, M. Hébert, and L. J. Herrera, "Comparative analysis of optical and numerical models for reflectance and color prediction of monolithic dental resin composites with varying thicknesses," Dental Materials, vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 1677-1684, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2024.07.013

15. M. Tejada-Casado, R. Ghinea, M. M. Pérez, A. Della Bona, H. Lübbe, and L. J. Herrera, "Chroma-dependence of CIEDE2000 acceptability thresholds for dentistry," Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 469-476, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13153