Robustness Evaluation of AI Security Monitoring Algorithms in Multi-Dimensional Data Flow Environments

Main Article Content

Mason Wright
Lucas Evans

Abstract

AI security monitoring algorithms are increasingly deployed to detect malicious activities within complex, multi-dimensional data flow environments. Ensuring the robustness of these algorithms against adversarial attacks and noisy data is crucial for maintaining system integrity. This review paper provides a comprehensive overview of techniques for evaluating the robustness of AI-based security monitoring algorithms specifically designed for multi-dimensional data flow environments. We begin by outlining the challenges associated with securing these environments and the role of AI in enhancing security monitoring capabilities. We then delve into a historical overview of robustness evaluation methods, highlighting their evolution and limitations. The core of the paper focuses on two key themes: adversarial robustness and data quality robustness. Adversarial robustness explores techniques for assessing and improving the resilience of algorithms against adversarial examples, while data quality robustness examines the impact of noisy, incomplete, or biased data on algorithm performance. We critically compare existing evaluation methodologies, emphasizing their strengths, weaknesses, and applicability to different types of AI algorithms and data flow environments. Further, we discuss the prominent challenges in ensuring robustness, such as scalability, transferability, and the need for adaptive evaluation techniques. The review concludes by outlining future research directions, including the development of more robust algorithms, advanced evaluation frameworks, and techniques for explainable robustness. This review will provide researchers and practitioners with a valuable resource for understanding the state-of-the-art in robustness evaluation and for guiding future efforts in developing more secure and reliable AI-based security monitoring systems.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Robustness Evaluation of AI Security Monitoring Algorithms in Multi-Dimensional Data Flow Environments. (2026). Journal of Sustainability, Policy, and Practice, 2(1), 27-34. https://schoalrx.com/index.php/jspp/article/view/73

References

1. O. Brown, A. Curtis, and J. Goodwin, “Principles for evaluation of ai/ml model performance and robustness,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.02868, 2021.

2. C. L. Cheong, “Research on AI Security Strategies and Practical Approaches for Risk Management”, J. Comput. Signal Syst. Res., vol. 2, no. 7, pp. 98–115, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.71222/17gqja14.

3. I. Zakariyya, H. Kalutarage, and M. O. Al-Kadri, “Towards a robust, effective and resource efficient machine learning technique for IoT security monitoring,” Computers & Security, vol. 133, 103388, 2023.

4. N. Jehan et al., “Adversarial Machine Learning for Cyber security Defense: Detecting Model Evasion, Poisoning Attacks, and Enhancing the Robustness of AI Systems,” Global Research Journal of Natural Science and Technology, vol. 3, no. 2, 2025.

5. E. G. Lee et al., “A Study on Robustness Evaluation and Improvement of AI Model for Malware Variation Analysis,” Journal of the Korea Institute of Information Security & Cryptology, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 997-1008, 2022.

6. W. Sun, “Integration of Market-Oriented Development Models and Marketing Strategies in Real Estate,” European Journal of Business, Economics & Management, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 45–52, 2025.

7. A. Awadid and B. Robert, “On Assessing ML Model Robustness: A Methodological Framework,” in Symposium on Scaling AI Assessments, 2025.

8. J. Mahilraj et al., “Evaluation of the robustness, transparency, reliability and safety of AI systems,” in 2023 9th International Conference on Advanced Computing and Communication Systems (ICACCS), 2023, vol. 1, pp. 2526-2535.

9. P. Roy, “Enhancing Real-World Robustness in AI: Challenges and Solutions,” J. Recent Trends Comput. Sci. Eng, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 34-49, 2024.

10. S. Yuan, “Data Flow Mechanisms and Model Applications in Intelligent Business Operation Platforms”, Financial Economics Insights, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 144–151, 2025, doi: 10.70088/m66tbm53.

11. H. Javed, S. El-Sappagh, and T. Abuhmed, “Robustness in deep learning models for medical diagnostics: security and adversarial challenges towards robust AI applications,” Artificial Intelligence Review, vol. 58, no. 1, 2024.

12. G. Ying, “Cloud computing and machine learning-driven security optimization and threat detection mechanisms for telecom operator networks,” Artificial Intelligence and Digital Technology, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 98–114, 2025.

13. D. Namiot and E. Ilyushin, “On the robustness and security of Artificial Intelligence systems,” International Journal of Open Information Technologies, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 126-134, 2022.

14. A. Agarwal and M. J. Nene, “Advancing trustworthy ai: A comparative evaluation of ai robustness toolboxes,” SN Computer Science, vol. 6, no. 3, 2025.

15. E. Binterová, “Safe and Secure High-Risk AI: Evaluation of Robustness,” 2023.

16. C. L. Chang et al., “Evaluating robustness of ai models against adversarial attacks,” in Proceedings of the 1st ACM Workshop on Security and Privacy on Artificial Intelligence, 2020, pp. 47-54.

17. X. Zhang, K. Li, Y. Dai, and S. Yi, “Modeling the land cover change in Chesapeake Bay area for precision conservation and green infrastructure planning,” Remote Sensing, vol. 16, no. 3, p. 545, 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16030545.

18. Y. Chen, H. Du, and Y. Zhou, “Lightweight network-based semantic segmentation for UAVs and its RISC-V implementation,” Journal of Technology Innovation and Engineering, vol. 1, no. 2, 2025.

19. B. Zhang, Z. Lin, and Y. Su, “Design and Implementation of Code Completion System Based on LLM and CodeBERT Hybrid Subsystem,” Journal of Computer, Signal, and System Research, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 49–56, 2025.