Quality Enhancement through Systematic Analysis across Industries

Main Article Content

Jing Li
Min Zhou
Feng Zhao

Abstract

Quality enhancement has emerged as a fundamental imperative for organizations operating across diverse industrial contexts where competitive pressures and stakeholder expectations continuously escalate. This paper examines systematic approaches to quality improvement through cross-sectoral analysis encompassing professional practice development, technological innovation, digital transformation, and operational excellence frameworks. By investigating quality management principles within contexts ranging from traditional pedagogical methods to contemporary digital manufacturing systems, this research identifies universal mechanisms that transcend industry boundaries. The study explores theoretical foundations of quality management including critical success factors, implementation practices, and performance relationships while examining how organizations leverage systematic analysis to achieve sustainable quality improvements. Through comprehensive examination of measurement frameworks, continuous improvement methodologies, and adaptive quality strategies, this paper demonstrates that successful quality enhancement requires integrated approaches combining rigorous assessment, evidence-based decision making, and sustained organizational commitment. The findings reveal that organizations achieving superior quality outcomes implement systematic analysis processes that identify improvement opportunities, validate intervention effectiveness, and foster cultures of continuous excellence. This interdisciplinary investigation provides practitioners with actionable frameworks for quality enhancement applicable across varied industrial environments while advancing theoretical understanding of quality management effectiveness.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Quality Enhancement through Systematic Analysis across Industries. (2025). Journal of Sustainability, Policy, and Practice, 1(3), 259-272. https://schoalrx.com/index.php/jspp/article/view/45

References

1. L. Yang, “The Evolution of Ballet Pedagogy: A Study of Traditional and Contemporary Approaches,” Journal of Literature and Arts Research, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 1–10, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.71222/2nw5qw82.

2. R. Sousa and C. A. Voss, “Quality Management re-visited: a Reflective Review and Agenda for Future Research,” Journal of Operations Management, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 91–109, 2002, doi: 10.1016/s0272-6963(01)00088-2.

3. S. Yang, “The Impact of Continuous Integration and Continuous Delivery on Software Development Efficiency,” Journal of Computer, Signal, and System Research, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 59–68, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.71222/pzvfqm21.

4. L. Xu, X. Peng, R. Pavur, and V. Prybutok, “Quality management theory development via meta-analysis,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 229, p. 107759, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107759.

5. Y. Liu, “Post-pandemic Architectural Design: A Review of Global Adaptations in Public Buildings,” International Journal of Engineering Advances, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 91–100, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.71222/1cj1j328.

6. A. Nair, “Meta-analysis of the relationship between quality management practices and firm performance-implications for quality management theory development,” Journal of Operations Management, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 948–975, 2005, doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2005.11.005.

7. X. Luo, “Immersive digital modeling and interactive manufacturing systems in the textile industry,” J. Comput. Signal Syst. Res., vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 31–40, 2025, doi: 10.71222/jyctft16.

8. M. García-Fernández, E. Claver-Cortés, and J. J. Tarí, “Relationships between quality management, innovation and performance: A literature systematic review,” European Research on Management and Business Economics, vol. 28, no. 1, p. 100172, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.iedeen.2021.100172.

9. S. Jing, "Practice of digital construction to improve construction project progress management," Academic Journal of Engineering and Technology Science, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 36–44, 2025, doi: 10.25236/AJETS.2025.080205.

10. X. Zu, L. D. Fredendall, and T. J. Douglas, “The evolving theory of quality management: The role of Six Sigma,” Journal of Operations Management, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 630–650, 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2008.02.001.

11. J. V. Saraph, P. G. Benson, and R. G. Schroeder, “An Instrument for Measuring the Critical Factors of Quality Management,” Decision Sciences, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 810–829, 1989, doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1989.tb01421.x.

12. B. B. Flynn, R. G. Schroeder, and S. Sakakibara, “The Impact of Quality Management Practices on Performance and Competitive Advantage,” Decision Sciences, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 659–691, 1995, doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1995.tb01445.x.

13. A. J. Setterstrom and J. T. Marchewka, “Improving IT Project Outcomes With the Deming Management Method: A Quality Management Approach,” International Journal of Information Technology Project Management (IJITPM), vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1–22, 2024, doi: 10.4018/IJITPM.335118.

14. G. Wang, “Performance evaluation and optimization of photovoltaic systems in urban environments,” Int. J. New Dev. Eng. Soc., vol. 9, pp. 42–49, 2025, doi: 10.25236/IJNDES.2025.090106.